ScanDisk You should run ScanDisk
regularly to check the health of your hard disk –
though it'll also check over other types of disk.
ScanDisk can fix certain types of error.
A basic test can be conducted by
running ScanDisk, clicking on the drive to be checked,
and pressing Start. Multiple drives may be selected by
[Ctrl]+clicking on each one. It's a good idea to have the
Automatically Fix Errors checkbox ticked:
 (August 1998).iso/full/W98Comp/Access/sd1.gif)
This will catch a lot of common
errors, such as lost file fragments (also known as lost
clusters) which often occur when a program gets itself in
a knot and fails, possibly bringing down the Windows
system with it. Lost clusters are parts of the disk which
are marked as being in use, but which don't belong to any
file. Unless they are recovered the space they occupy
will be forever lost, reducing the capacity of the drive.
You may also see mention of
cross-linked files. This is where two or more files are
shown in the File Allocation Table (FAT) to be using the
same part of the disk – clearly an impossibility,
and at least one of them does not own the 'shared'
section.
It is so important to run ScanDisk
after a mishap that Windows 98 will run it automatically
if it is not shut down properly. Even if you don't
experience such problems, run ScanDisk at least once a
week.
You may like to configure the
program's behaviour by pressing the Advanced button which
takes you here:
 (August 1998).iso/full/W98Comp/Access/sd2.gif)
This dialog has two extra options
over the Windows 95 version: you can now ask ScanDisk to
check for duplicate filenames. You wouldn't normally be
allowed to have the same name twice in a folder, but it
might happen by mistake. Ticking this checkbox will make
ScanDisk run slower on folders containing a large number
of files.
On the bottom right is the other
new option, Report MS-DOS Mode Name Length Errors. This
will deal with files whose path plus filename exceeds 66
characters, which makes it impossible to open the
directory in MS-DOS mode. Here is an example error
report:
 (August 1998).iso/full/W98Comp/Access/sd3.gif)
You may not be worried by such
reports, because you can access the files through Windows
98 and in an MS-DOS box. You just can't start in MS-DOS
mode and access them from there.
Of the other advanced options, the
first two sections on the left are easy to understand and
the settings are entirely up to you. The other three
sections need more careful consideration, however.
Cross-linked files can be deleted
if you are confident that you have backups of important
files. If you haven't, then you may want to use advanced
recovery tools or a data recovery service to try to piece
together at least one good file out of the two. In such
cases cross-linked files should not be deleted. Ignoring
problem files should be a temporary measure only.
The same arguments apply to lost
file fragments: free them up if you know you have good
backups. Convert them to files and try to extract the
data from them if you're in trouble. Expect to pay
frightening amounts of money if you don't have the
expertise to do this yourself.
In the Check Files For section,
invalid filenames are those that break the rules for
naming files, and may therefore be inaccessible from the
DOS command line, for example. Invalid Dates and Times
include files whose dates/times are in the future. The
cause may be as simple as you having adjusted your system
clock since the file was last used, or it may indicate
something more serious. If you want ScanDisk to fix this
type of error, it will delete offending files or make
their date/time stamps current, prompting you back in the
main dialog, ScanDisk's standard test only looks for
errors in the way data has been stored on the disk –
errors analogous to misprints in a book. What it doesn't
check is the disk itself. Being able to read all of a
book doesn't mean there aren't holes in the paper that
hasn't yet been written on, or there isn't printed paper
which is in bad condition and about to disintegrate.
A more fundamental test of disk
health is conducted by the thorough option. This is
slower than the standard scan, and so should be run less
frequently unless you're investigating a problem. Under
normal circumstances, once a month is sensible on PCs
which are backed up regularly and are not
mission-critical.
|